TapMode iPhone Development

Well news addict has finally been approved at the 17+ rating.  I really hope this doesn’t hurt sales. I added a bunch of new sites that have been requested.  The big new secret feature was tilt scrolling.  I hope everyone likes it.   This is similar to instapaper’s tilt scrolling.  If you haven’t used that app be sure to check it out.  It’s one of my favorites.

Anyway I am hard at work on the next version of News Addict 1.3.  Version 1.3 will add the ability to add/edit and remove icons.  There are actually 14 distinct features required to do this along with a couple of server side components I need to build.  This update will actually be much larger than all the code I have written so far, so I believe it will take me a while to complete. Anyway look for that next.

Well I see some other developers saying their apps are being required to be listed at 17+.  So I have decided to just bite the bullet and list mine at 17+ also.  Quite frankly this is completely stupid and a hack on Apple’s part.  They need a new option under ratings instead.  They need the option “Does this application allow access to the internet that you do not specifically control the content of?”  You would check yes or no.  This would not change the rating of the app itself.  Then parent’s could filter apps based on not allowing apps which provide access to the internet.

Right now Apple is forcing me to rate my application artificially high so it can handle situations in my app that are unlikely to exist and it was never designed for.  The current system is just going to confuse users with warnings for apps that don’t have the content that apple is trying to block.

Well News Addict has been rejected again.  Apparently I must rate the app at 17+ and maybe then I will be accepted. Apple told me my app provides unrestricted access to the internet.  However I only allow access to specific news sites so its far from open access to the internet.  A user can’t even type a url in my News app.  If I have to rate News Addict at 17+, it means every app that provides any kind of internet access will soon have to offer a 17+ rating or face possible rejection.

Browsing around iTunes, I looked at other similar apps.  All of my competitor news apps are rated 4+ and are allowed in the store.  I even looked at browser replacement apps, they all are rated at 4+ even though these allow true unrestricted access to the internet.  Even the “iPron private browser” made to specifically browse content that may fit the 17+ rating has a 4+ rating.

The problem with rating all these apps at 17+ is the rating system is not useful for parents and makes users wonder what the issue is with an app.  Twitter clients 17+… Facebook 17+… News Apps 17+…  Instant messaging 17+… Social Apps 17+… Drawing apps 17+… (I could draw something obscene…) Games with Leader boards 17+… (no telling what gamer tags people will be using).

I also tested out parental blocking.  Even if you decide to block all your apps, apple’s safari and other apps are still accessible.  Apple provides separate controls for disabling those.  So if a parent uses parental blocking only, the rating system is pretty much worthless without also manually blocking apple’s own built in apps one at a time.

Apple needs to rate apps based on what they actually contain not what they might be used for.  This is the equivalent of putting 17+ ratings on TV sets because they have the potential to play R rated movies.

Well its official apple still hates me.  Seems they rejected the update again even after I was told they were going to re-review it.  I get the same form message I originally got in the rejection.  So I am not even sure if anything new went into the re-review process like taking into consideration my comments.  Anyway I am going to try once again to at least get a 12+ rating.  I really have no understanding as to why my app requires a 17+ rating.

[UPDATE: well apple still wants me to rate it 17+.  So basically now every app that provides any kind of access to the internet can be considered 17+?]

Well I resubmitted News Addict. I also went ahead and put it at 12+ rating. Maybe its for the best as I had a couple of bug fixes since the original submission that will be included provided of course that it actually makes it through the approval process.

I spent a good day figuring a way to make the BBC news website text bigger.  I have more functionality in my app than other similar news apps so that’s what caused this trouble in the first place.  You will notice in my app that if you go to a full size page you have the ability to pinch, zoom and double tap around the page like with mobile safari.  The other news apps as far as I know, can’t do this.  But as a side effect it causes the BBC page to look wrong because the BBC didn’t design their page properly for the iPhone.  Well after a day of trying a bunch of ideas, I finally got it working.  Anyway it’s little stuff like this that the average user would have no concept that anything special had to be done.  I also want News Addict to be the best browser for mobile content so it’s why I refused to sacrifice functionality anywhere even if you may not use the pinch and zoom features now.  I believe many more users will need this functionality once I allow the ability to add your own news sites.

Yet again another rejection of News Addict.  Yet again it passed the last two times, no problem.  But apparently since my app allows access to the internet I must rate it 17+ because who knows what could be there?  Really I don’t have a problem with this, but if Apple wants to rate my app then just rate it themselves.  Why reject it and have me resubmit.  If they want to make it 17+, then make it 17+ and just notify me they had to change the rating.

So now I get to resubmit again.  Wait another week or so.

Oh I also have 5 break out apps submitted awaiting reviews and here is the kicker.  I can’t actually change the ratings while they are under review.  So now either I have to reject and resubmit each or wait for the rejection.  What an f****d up system.

[Update: Just noticed not one of my competitors have to rate their apps at 17+.  All are listed at 4+.  There are a couple of news apps rated at 12+.  However I have to rate mine 17+.  I don’t even think this is just some new rule either as my main competitor just had an update approved yesterday and his app is 4+. So its official, apple just hates me.]

[UPDATE 2: I emailed apple with my predicament and they actually have told me they will re-review it.  WOW! AWESOME!  Maybe they don’t hate me after all and it was just a mix up.  Lets Hope!]

Well I almost have three breakout apps done for various categories.  One thing I have noticed is the entertainment industry has by far the best iphone optimized sites.  Tech is by far the worse.  I would have expected that to be reversed…